I’ve been recommending Miles Mathis’ research papers to most of the people I correspond with because, like Jeff Miller and Gregg Hallett, he’s writing about an important and timely subject almost entirely alone, for now.
For example, Jeff’s the only living soul who is collecting published evidence to show that the overall condition of the world is improving rather dramatically, which is contrary to the frenetic doom claims of the media, academia and governments. We’re rather thrilled and feel honored that he’s chosen this website to record this major opus: his long-running Positive Changes That Are Occurring blog.. I was pleased to meet him in Pennsylvania in July, 2016.
Gregg Hallett has published abundant evidence that Hitler and Stalin were British projects, also proved that Queen Victoria was legitimately married before she arrived in England and had a son from that union, who grew up in Portugal. He documented some profoundly revealing truths about how both world wars were created and managed, also shared unique insights for how key media personalities, historically, have also been also agency spooks and, in Britain’s case, breeders for royalty. His work dovetails particularly well with Mathis’ findings. Carol’s acquainted with him and I got most of his books in trade for zappers.
Of the three, Jeff’s the only one who is considerate to his readers, I”m sorry to say. Hallett is simply a bit of a curmudgeon, disinclined to consult, but Miles Mathis seems to go out of his way to insult just about everyone, which is why I”m writing this. I feel dismayed that so many people who could be empowered by Mathis’ work simply turn away from it because they feel legitimately offended, as I was.
Here’s how he offended me: he offhandedly referred to ‘Abdu’l-Baha, who is the exemplar of my faith, as ‘That Big Fake.’ ‘Abdu’l-Baha spent most of his life in exile and gruelling imprisonment until the overthrow of of the Sultan of Turkey in 1908 finally enabled him to travel abroad from the prison city of Akka, Palestine in his twilight years. He had caused an ancient aqueduct to be repaired with volunteer labor so that life in that pestilential prison colony improved for everyone, by the way, and he returned there after his travels. Nobody who actually knows about his life and teachings would call him a fake, of course. He gave a series of lectures to the London Theosophical Society, by the way, in which he gently encouraged them to freely use their rational minds and stop being shackled by dogma and blind imitation , which of course is now the default popular ‘alternative’ ideology throughout the West.
To his credit, at the beginning of each paper he writes, clearly, that all of his statements are simply his opinions. Also to his credit, he invites several substantive guest writers, including Josh in Israel (who did a landmark exposé on the pivotal, late 1800s Dreyfus Affair) to publish on his site and I enjoy their work as much as his.
My religion teaches that we must consult freely with each other in order to solve all of our problems (including, in my opinion, the attempted destruction of our world with various poisons by the corporate order) but also to avoid being overly critical of each other. I was going to write to him but it seems clear in his work that he is opposed to anyone who believes as I do so if he were to read my notes I assume he’d just react rather than respond. I hope he’ll read this, though, and contact me if he feels like it. I don’t feel a need to make people believe as I do and my beliefs constantly change (improve, hopefully), anyway, subject to the availability of additional factual data..
Since every conclusion is his opinion it’s up to the reader to discern for himself whether he’s produced enough evidence to support the opinion. When he does analyses of faked historic photos his work is beyond reproach, in my opinion, and he’s clearly qualified to do that. He meticulously explains how the faking was done and it’s easy to follow his work.
The reason I read everything he writes is that I don’t want to miss something important and the solid elements of his work are quite empowering, at least for me. It’s well worth the occasional discomfort and, as a friend noted, ‘When you’re a hammer, everything looks like a nail.’
Those of us who work with orgonite understand at least a little bit about the dynamics of subtle (etheric) energy or at least have a working relationship with it. Dr Reich used to get frustrated because his unlettered workers, who mass produced his orgone accumulators, generally understood orgone (ether) much better than his academic protégés did. I never seek the approval of academics on account of that. I’m unlettered, too. I think academics are typically more superstitious/mystical than rational but that was sure not true about Reich, who encouraged everyone to ‘be aware of mystical processes without being a mystic.’.
MM’s extensive science training is rather traditional and materialistic, so I doubt he’d be receptive to Dr Reich’s findings and our own related work but I hope I’m wrong. He denies the existence of the nuclear program, apparently based on the obviously faked photos of the Bikini Atoll hydrogen bomb test of 1953. A friend recently told me that knows some people who spent some vacation time on one of those bombed-out atolls and apparently got radiation sickness and died too soon. My X2 worked at Seabrook Nuke Facility for 17 years and told me that most of the people she knew, there, who worked near the reactor had died young of cancer.
If one is aware of subtle energy dynamics one recognizes that nuclear energy is poisonous simply because it generates a lot of the form of ether that Dr Reich called, ‘deadly orgone radiation.’ When Carol, Reno Richard and I distributed hundreds of orgonite pieces throughout the Nevada valley around Fallon is and through the adjacent valley our noses practically bled from the radiation poisoning on the first night that we camped there, then after we were done the environment was vital and we experienced no more discomfort during the night’s rest..
He’s a world-class portrait artist who flatly condemns all modern popular and abstract art and I think rightly states that the modern-art movement is generally an intelligence op, designed to debase popular culture some more while laundering corporate criminals’ Big Money. As evidence, to me, that this is not entirely true, I hope you’ll check out my good friend and fellow orgonite flinger, John Kilroy’s, art, some of which has some abstract elements in it: https://www.pinterest.com/johnkilroy/john-kilroy-fine-artist/.
When i visited him in 2004 in Boston he had paintings of a couple of rather famous artists around the house to look at for a time. He and they exchanged paintings with each other regularly and I think that’s a very healthy and productive sort of networking and interchange.. They visit each other, too.
I empathize with MM’s frustration about crappy popularized art, though in a little different way. Before I left the US in 1984 to do some work in the South Pacific I used to listen to the black popular music station in St Louis, while I worked. I loved the music because it was lively, varied, lyrical and colorful (sic) but when I came back to St Louis, just a year later, all of that music had been supplanted with rough, ugly, angry rap music, which I wasn’t able to listen to without feeling depressed. The internet wasn’t born, yet. For that matter, when I lived in the Caribbean in the early 70s the radio stations were playing wonderful and varied island music, including steel drums, salsa and calypso. It was all good, there were several styles and it was all slightly exotic to me. When all of that (except salsa) was abruptly displaced by reggae, which all sounds to me like it’s done by the same band of low-talent stoners and feels incredibly monotonous, I also felt a bit depressed.
Over the years, though, rap has turned into a legitimate art form that includes some impressive poetry and even Sergio Mendes features some rap musicians on a recent compilation CD. It seems obvious to me that some abstract art is also legitimate. For me, the jury’s still out for reggae but my opinion’s no better or worse than anyone’s of course. Maybe reggae will turn into a genuine art form, too.
So, even when the CIA tries to ruin popular culture some more, their efforts backfire on them as often as not because the human spirit is essentially irrepressible and we’re driven to be creative, at least when we’re sober. The enemy can’t understand this, I believe–one of their several fatal flaws?
MM’s focus on the predominance of Jewish families in ‘the peerage’ from whom essentially all popular figures are recruited, historically, is a legitimate enquiry and he admirably presents it all without judgement. I’m as fascinated as he is by this.
If I were to converse with him I’d suggest reading Admiral Flavio Barbieri’s extensive research about the apparent Jewish authorship (by the surviving priests of the Jerusalem Temple after that city’s destruction) of the Roman Catholic Church and also ‘the temporary bridge’ between Roman paganism and state churchianity: Mithraism. Barbieri, who I assume is a crypto-Jew, says (accurately, in my opinion) that ‘The Jews are the greatest protagonists of history.’ In his research, MM hasn’t dug deeper, yet, than the late medieval period of Europe. I would also suggest reading David Livingston’s exhaustive research into the late-medieval origins of today’s popular pseudomystical dogmas, including Kabbalah, gnosticism and theosophy, Jews predominated in all that, too. The Mongol phenomenon drove much of Europe’s pre-renaissance history and the Mongols were arguably not Jewish, though the Gypsies whom Tamerlane forced to leave Northern India and migrate to the Mideast and Northern Europe, were apparently descended from Jews of the Assyrian displacement of 800BC. The civilizing influence on Europe from China is on account of the Mongol, Kublai Khan, who was also not a Jew. He made Tibetan Buddhism the state religion of his regime, though everyone had freedom of conscience to choose his own religion in that empire. The Tibetans are Mongols..
Nor were the Ethiopian or Nubian civilizations Jewish in Biblical times and those have profoundly influenced the West, too. Bookbinding came from Ethiopia, by the way. Europeans were still writing on scrolls before the Arabs introduced bookbinding in the late middle ages. It may be that the Queen of Sheba was more protagonist than Solomon and ‘The Promised Land’ had to pay annual tribute to Egypt, then to Assyria, then to Babylon, then to Rome; it was never a sovereign nation until British Intelligence and their Mossadomite terrorist stooges made it so in 1947 😉 which is also when the CIA was born, as MM never tires of pointing out.
I now suspect that the Cathars in Europe (they are still around and there are a lot of them) are hereditary Jewish Christians (the most pristine form of that Faith?) and if that’s the case, then it potentially adds a great deal more to the positive side of the protagonism of Jews. I’m so eager to know whether or not I’m mistaken that I intend to learn French in Quebec City, next summer, and spend time next year in Languedoc with my amazing wife, talking to any Cathars who are willing to be candid with me . Carol’s met a few of them there and they’re not shy about talking to individuals who are genuinely interested; they simply seem to avoid doing it publicly, presumably for the sake of their community’s safety. If you’re inclined to subtlety, though, this might interest you and I suspect a Cathar recently wrote it: http://www.languedoc-france.info/190403_paratge.htm . If memory serves, Carlos Silva of orgonite-portugal.com sent that to me several years ago. I look forward to possibly meeting Cathars in Italy, Germany, Spain, Ireland, Scotland and Portugal, too, if I can live that long. Maybe England, the birthplace of modern genocide, even has them.
To dig even deeper into the history of Jewish protagonism, I’ve read a book by an amateur Egyptian archaeologist (his day job was practicing law in London) which shows compelling evidence that Moses was the pharaoh, Akhenaton, and that the 300,000 Jews who fled Egypt were not Hebrews but were mostly Egyptian converts to Akhenaton’s (Moses?) monotheism, which was certainly not in sync with Egyptian traditions and beliefs. Two generations earlier, only 71 Hebrews migrated to Egypt and we know that humans don’t replicate like a virus. Joseph, the Hebrew who became Egypt’s prime minister, was Akhenaton’s grandfather. Akkenaton’s mother (Joseph’s daughter) was a Hebrew as well as an Egyptian princess. Freud believed all of this and wrote an unpublished (he died, then) book about it but I’m not inclined to use him as an endorsement because I think he was a complete jerk–he ran the Tavistock Institute at the time, after all, and his academic progeny fill the halls at Langley as well as Tavistock. Reich, who actually cured mentally ill people instead of just analyzing them, had nothing bur respect for Freud but I suspect that Freud’s the one who blackballed Reich and thus forced him to leave psychiatry/medicine and to rewrite physics and biology 😉 –another case of backfired psiop? The CIA published our orgonite cloudbuster plans, which resulted in the defeat of the then-expanding chemtrail bioweaponry agenda within a year or so. They’re still hosting the plans, so their massive chemtrail fear porn psychological warfare agenda still inspires thousands of people to build and buy orgonite cloudbusters 😉
Those two books didn’t show up on amazon,com when I looked for them, recently (I bet they will after this 😉 ) and I assume that the authors, who are quite impressive, are also not mentioned in WiCIApedia. When I get home from this little weekend trip I’ll tell you the titles and authors. I need to re-read them, too, as I sometimes do with MM’s and Hallett’s material.
Carol got both of them for me from the publisher, who usually has a shop at the Tucson Gem Show. She says the fellow, who owns Bear Publishing in Vermont, is very friendly and forthcoming and that he seeks out unique and substantive authors like these two. We won’t find books like these or Hallett’s in corporate bookstores 😉
I think we’re each only able to digest a finite amount of empowering material at one sitting, so we ought to be patient with ourselves and not try to swallow it all at once. You can see that even though MM could benefit by working on his people skills a bit I still strongly feel that his work is timely and extremely important. To know that popular culture is a cynical facade and that the media, gov’t and academia always lie is very important, don’t you agree? We stop trusting individuals in our lives who are found to be liars, so why do most people keep trusting these manifestly obvious professional liars if not because we were all simply programmed to trust them?
Only dogmatic fools believe that education ought to be comfortable. In life, most of our important lessons come with a measure of pain and the pain that comes from finally realizing that most of what we were taught was a lie is just a temporary discomfort if we’ll just persevere. After that, curiosity and the intellect can be unleashed, then life gets more interesting and fun and we find new, genuine friends in the world.
I’ve always felt sad for that horde of lockstep theosophy drones because in their drive to break through the older facade they’ve only come up up against a parti-colored sub-surface of the same boring, lifeless Hollywood set and then honestly believe that they’re ‘enlightened.’
MM hates all of the religions and calls himself a hippie but he was a toddler in the late 60s. If he were my age he would have been able to directly observe and interact with the proto-hippies and I think his romantic view of them would be traumatically challenged if he went back in time to do that.
I started meeting hippies when I returned to the US after high school in 1967 and experienced genuine culture shock because in spite of their grand-sounding ‘spiritual’ discourses, which I had admired from afar, I found them to be militantly dogmatic, utterly intolerant and conformist–where were the ‘free spirits?’ I was a free spirit but for me, spiritual freedom is mainly represented by an unshackled intellect, an open mind and heart and boundless curiosity, which only sobriety allows.
In the late 80s I was acquainted with an intelligent woman who had been a proto-hippie during her teen years in the late 60s and she was rather bitter about the hidden misogyny of ‘free love,’ because it favored the males and soon turned droves of girls into man-hating lesbians.
The hippie/stoner movement was, after all, British Intelligence’s and CIA’s (theosophy and brain-deadening drugs) mega-psychological-operation debut as the default Western popular ideology, after a decade or so of preparation during their lower-profile beatnik psi op.
It seems odd to me that MM does a good, thorough job of exposing both theosophy, the CIA’s drug culture and each of the beat generation’s artificially-popularized and empty authors and alleged poets. He’s passionately disinclined to use psychotropics, but still romanticizes hippies and hangs out at an ashram in Taos. I think he’s correct that the intelligence corps were simply vamping the late-60s period of general awakening and got control of it all. I would say to him that it’s possible to appreciate the positive, organic aspects of the 60s enlightenment without embracing those popular trappings.
The intelligence agencies are utterly failing to get control of the present cycle of human awakening, obviously, in spite of their charismatic but frenetic theosophy pandering on the YouTube sidelines. I’m seeing a lot of newagers (theosophy drones) losing patience with the fakery, finally (my fingers are crossed).
Discernment and accountability are finally becoming fashionable, so the harder the sewer rats try to smother factual data with saccharin dogma and charismatic but empty personalities the more obvious their efforts are becoming. I don’t think they’re capable of understanding this, which is evidence to some that they’re clinically insane.. It’s fun to watch, at least. To; me, these are still the good old days.
I have a standing request for anyone to shoot me in the back of the head if I ever display ideological ambiguity because I want very much to be held accountable for intellectual honesty..
Thank you, my old friend and partner in handcuffs, Francisco ‘Paco’ Garcia Subirachs of the would-be Catalunya Republic and orgonita.eu, for introducing me to milesmathisupdates.com two years ago! I dearly hope that more people will just bite the bullet and assimilate the unique and pristine, empowering essence of what MM is offering, regardless of his sometimes-distressing humanity.
Subscribe Share on Facebook